We recently published Lior Torenberg’s stunning “Je Dévore.” Here, we ask her two questions about her story:
1) I fell in love with the first sentence of this story: “My mother taught housewives how to bake, and then she died.” The baking is such an important thing for the narrator to try to learn about their mother, and those little high heels too. They seem like such unconnected things, baking, wearing high heels. How do you feel they become part of the same thing for the narrator?
The heels, the baking – they’re symbols of femininity. My narrator idolizes his mother as a representative of the ideal woman without acknowledging what she gave up to acquire those totems, and how restrictive they can often be. For Marge/Margaux (and for everyone) femininity is a performance, a costume, just like it is for the narrator later in his life. The difference is that, for Marge, it is confining, but for the narrator, it is freeing.
2) The section with the changing of names is very powerful — it seems expected to be “American” that you must have an American name. The mother goes from Margaux to Marge — do you think she lost a piece of herself with that change, the way she lost her French?
I think Margaux did lose a piece of herself by switching to Marge, but to be more specific: she willingly gave up a piece of herself in exchange for something else. Cultural capital, belonging, the avoidance of potential discrimination. She had found a new life for herself and wanted to immerse herself fully in it. I want to emphasize that, at the time, she was excited to do so. When I moved to America, there was a while when I wanted to go by Lori instead of Lior. It’s only later that you realize what you’ve given up. The narrator tries to pay tribute to his mother by allowing her to live after her death as someone free and unapologetically Margaux.


A singer on a TV talk show is sharing a story about her voice and how it’s changed. She wonders if longtime fans hear her new songs and realize she’s the one singing them.

They passed a law that everyone had to constantly stand in paint. They didn’t care about the colour, but you absolutely had to be barefoot. The announcement came over the tannoy one day; and was repeated, in every country, in every language. Nobody knew why…of course, that didn’t stop them pretending. It’s to get the kids moving again – and cut childhood obesity. Not it’s not – it’s to boost our country’s manufacturing, by making all that paint! Can’t you see that this is what happens when we have artists in government? You could hop-scotch; Fox-Trot; march; shuffle; pace; heel-to-toe… nearly anything went. Those who liked to bend the rules, bent themselves and tumbled, hand-stand first into the coloured emulsion. If you had no legs, or legs that meant you were less able to get around – you were allowed to create imprints with your prosthetics or mobilising aids. If you were yet-to-walk, your parents could legally take your tiny little feet and plunge them into any colour they wanted – it didn’t matter that the hue would make your nauseous, or anxious, or overwhelmed in years to come. Those whose digits danced, only left fingerprints so far. Nobody knows what happened to them, after their thumbprints disappeared. Maybe they suddenly ran out of energy – after all, nobody could get by, walking on their hands for a long time (all the blood would rush to their head). Yes, that was definitely what happened. The wheelers and walkers; the little baby not-yet-walkers – their imprints only lasted so far. In the end, everyone was the same. It didn’t matter if the colour you’d chosen was daffodil yellow or midnight black. In the end, everyone walked all over one another – until there was no trace of a single individual – and every colour, however once-bright, had merged to a forgettable-mud.