The Story Where the Mother Dies in Childbirth ~ by Emily Rinkema

In Alice’s stories the mother always dies. Or is dead already. Or is absent in a way that suggests, to the perceptive reader, that she is likely dead. There are mother figures, maybe a step-mother or a grandmother or an aunt or a motherly neighbor, but no actual live mothers by the end of her stories.

In one story, the mother, an old woman, dies in a plane crash, and the tragedy is that when the list of victims is published, they misspell the old woman’s name and her daughter, who is estranged, reads the names while waiting for a haircut and abstractly mourns all the losses before asking her stylist for bangs like that French actress in the movie about the war.

In another, the mother, who is young and beautiful, dies of brain cancer, and the death is quick, painless mostly, and the family, all four kids and the father and the extended family and the neighbors, gather around her in the hospital and one at a time they name a thing they hope is in heaven, only the youngest daughter, who is just eight years old, can’t help but list two things she hopes are waiting for her mom: olives and meerkats.

Alice has a soft spot for the story about the taxi driver, the one where a daughter is on her way to the airport and the taxi driver asks where she’s going and she decides to lie and say she is going to visit her mother, even though her mother is dead, and then the driver says his mother is dead too, and the narrator says she’s sorry for his loss and they sing a song together as the snow falls outside.

The mothers in Alice’s stories die in many ways. There are the sudden deaths–the plane crash, two car crashes, a wrong-place-wrong-time murder, an escalator accident, a choking death. There are the illness related deaths–four types of cancer, a heart attack, an undiagnosed syndrome following an insect bite in the islands off South Carolina, kidney failure, dementia. There are the assumed deaths, absences that have gone on so long that the family or the lover or the parents or the spouse or the daughter can no longer cling to hope, can no longer hear the sound of her voice or imagine the way she looks when she’s sleeping or when she steps through the front door carrying too many grocery bags for one trip.

And then there’s the story where there’s just no mother at all. No death, no loss, no estrangement, no grief, no searching, no longing, no anger, no questions, no memories. Just a general absence so inconspicuous that even Alice sometimes forgets what the story is really about.

***

Emily Rinkema lives and writes in northern Vermont, USA. Her writing has most recently appeared in X-R-A-Y, Variant Lit, Flash Frog, and Mudroom Magazine, and she has stories in the Best American Nonrequired Reading, Bath Flash, and Oxford Flash anthologies. She won the 2024 Cambridge Prize and the 2024 Lascaux Prize for flash fiction. You can read her work on her website (https://emilyrinkema.wixsite.com/my-site) or follow her on X, BS, or IG (@emilyrinkema)

Two Questions for Jessica Klimesh

We recently published Jessica Klimesh’s haunting “For Fun, Your Boyfriend Dissects Furbies.”

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) So, Furbies. Furbies are terrifying, right? I mean, they’re terrifying! Why do you think the boyfriend focuses on Furbies?
I see the boyfriend as rather aloof, troubled, in need of direction in his life. He perhaps bought a Furby and was initially just curious as to how it worked so he took it apart, but then one thing led to another. The interesting thing about Furbies, which came out in 1998, is that they started out by speaking “Furbish,” apparently “learning” their human’s language over time. I did some research and found that, supposedly, they were capable of learning a number of languages. Not only that, but in 1999, the NSA apparently banned Furbies from their premises, over fear that they might record sensitive information. The FAA was also leery of Furbies’ technology. In general, there was a lot of suspicion surrounding Furbies. All of this feels very symbolic in this story, given what I see as a profound lack of communication between the two people. Perhaps the boyfriend is willingly (and metaphorically) destroying language/communication, or perhaps he’s worried that his secrets, whatever they are, will be exposed if the Furbies are put back together and able to talk. Or perhaps his lack of trust is so encompassing that he simply wants to try to “kill” them all.

2) I love that the narrator assumes that the boyfriend needs more space literally, because of the Furbies — it shows such a disconnect between the two. Is there any chance they could reconnect? Or will it just be the boyfriend and the bones of the Furbies all alone?
I think that even if the two stay together, they will be alone; they are in two different worlds, whether they realize it or not. It’s like every dissected Furby represents a chasm of sorts between the two. I see the narrator as too blind, either willingly or simply naively, to see what’s really going on.

For Fun, Your Boyfriend Dissects Furbies ~ by Jessica Klimesh

He lines the Furbies’ computer corpses up on the half wall between the kitchen and living room of his one-bedroom apartment. He starts with two, then it’s three, then four. Each time you go over, there’s another one, and whenever you stay the night, you can hear them, whimpering, slurring their words like they’re drunk, calling out for someone or something.

I think they’re crying, you say. Maybe you should put them back together.

But he doesn’t, and now they’re multiplying. There’s another five, six, seven.

Now they’re on the kitchen counter. Now they’re in the bathroom. Now they’re under the bed.

He moves to a different apartment, says it’s because he needs more space.

Because of the Furbies? you ask.

For lots of reasons, he says.

But when you go over to his new place, expecting to see the dissected Furbies, they aren’t there.

Now there are only bones.

***

Jessica Klimesh (she/her) is a US-based writer and editor whose creative work has appeared or is forthcoming in Flash Frog, Gone Lawn, Ghost Parachute, Gooseberry Pie Lit, trampset, and Many Nice Donkeys, among others. Her work has been nominated for the Pushcart Prize, Best Microfiction, Best Small Fictions, and Best of the Net. Learn more at jessicaklimesh.com.

Two Questions for Mario Aliberto III

We recently published Mario Aliberto’s brilliant “Something Out of a Horror Movie.”

Here, we ask him two questions about his story:

1) I love that this is a Final Girl story that focuses on The Bad Girl (or what I like to think of as “the first girl”). You give this character so much weight, so much truth, so much power. What drew you to The Bad Girl as your heroine?
As a horror movie fan, I love the genre’s tropes, and so many movies are based on The Final Girl. What drew me to The Bad Girl was the idea of Jamie Curtis playing Laurie Strode in Halloween. In the recent sequels, Laurie Strode is older and wiser, and very much a bad ass. And it made me think, had she been this much of a bad ass from the beginning, Michael Myers wouldn’t have stood a chance. And on a theme side, I’m infatuated with the idea of how scared everyone is of a woman doing exactly what she wants. How powerful she is, and how the monster (society) has to destroy her, because God forbid a woman lives her life exactly how she wants.

2) And yes! YES! All those things that the story tells us The Bad Girl would do, she would do. And that’s why she has to be stopped.But still — I think I’d like to see this movie. The one where she lives. The one where she conquers. Where she saves everyone. Don’t you think it would be marvelous?
I want to see that movie desperately! I’m sure someone will tell us that the movie probably exists out there, but I don’t think I’ve seen it. But if the movie is out there or ever made in the future, I want The Bad Girl to slay the monster and keep on living life by her rules. She deserves it. All The Bad Girls do.

Something Out of a Horror Movie ~ by Mario Aliberto III

In the horror movie she calls a life, The Bad Girl gets cast as a camp counselor because she’s hot, she knows she’s hot, and every horror movie needs an antagonist to the virginal Final Girl, at least until the monster shows up. Also, Camp Silver Springs is desperate for counselors, lenient with job experience, and it’s like getting paid to party. So, although she never agreed to it, the newspapers will forever refer to her as The Bad Girl, because no one remembers anyone’s name besides the monster’s in a horror movie, not The Jock’s, not The Nerd’s, not even The Final Girl’s.

One night, drinking warm beer around a fire pit with the other counselors, The Bad Girl listens to The Final Girl once again complain they should follow the rules. Be better role models to the campers. The Bad Girl tells The Final Girl to Fuck off, that she hopes the campers are breaking curfew, telling ghost stories, toilet papering cabins, or sharing sloppy first kisses, because a little trouble is good for the little dorks. Following rules is bullshit, it’s all bullshit, and no matter what, the world’s going to try to kill you anyway, that’s the only thing for certain, so do what the fuck makes you happy with the little time you have.

During a game of Never Have I Ever, The Bad Girl finishes off a six-pack of Miller Lite on her own by taking a big gulp when someone says never have I ever: Kissed a girl, smoked a joint, had a threesome, had a black eye, buried a mother, got a tattoo, lived out of a car, ate food out of the trash, got a second tattoo, tried acid, crowd-surfed in a mosh pit, stole a car, broke someone’s nose, been in handcuffs, been in love.

The Final Girl didn’t drink to any of those, but it’s that last one, never having been in love, that makes The Bad Girl soften a bit. The same way she feels about the campers, she now feels about The Final Girl, wanting her to live a little. Wants her to break some rules. Do something stupid. Something she might regret. To make mistakes. Have no regrets because you never know when your time is up.

Millions of stars, and The Bad Girl takes a stroll to the lake with a girl following, a girl being led, a girl chosen, The Final Girl, because she needs this. They both do. Refracted moonlight on lake water, knees digging into the sand, straddling The Final Girl because The Bad Girl doesn’t fuck on her back, she wants the world to see her, young and beautiful, and her last thoughts are a mix of pleasure and philosophy, how life is short, how life must be short even to stars millions of years old, how at the end of their life even stars must wish for just a little more time.

The Bad Girl doesn’t get a chance to scream when the machete wielding monster steps out of the woods, sneaks up on her, and swings for her neck. It is inevitable. Everyone has their role to play. The Bad Girl’s role is to warn viewers to stay away from sex and drugs. And in this movie, this life, her death serves as the inciting incident for The Final Girl to enter her badass monster-killer era, but only after watching all her friends meet gory deaths. Except, the thing no one ever talks about, not the director, not the critics, not the audience, the real reason the monster kills The Bad Girl first, is not because she drinks, or gets high, or likes to fuck. No, it’s because if the monster doesn’t take her out first, she’ll run him over with the camp bus. Stab his eyes out with the sticks they use to roast s’mores. Take his machete and cut his fucking head off. The Bad Girl would save everybody. And what would the newspapers name her then?

***

Mario Aliberto III is an award-nominated writer whose work appears in SmokeLong Quarterly, trampset, The Pinch, and others. His debut chapbook, All the Dead We Have Yet to Bury, is forthcoming from Chestnut Review in early 2025. He lives in Tampa Bay with his wife and daughters, and yet the dog still runs the house. Twitter: @marioaliberto3

Two Questions for Kathryn Silver-Hajo

We recently published Kathryn Silver-Hajo’s gorgeous “Beforemath.”

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) I love the title of this story! “Beforemath.” I had never thought of it that way before, the calm before the storm. What called this title to you?
Between the wars raging overseas and looming dangers of post-election America, I’ve been ruminating quite a bit on the future, the enormous responsibility we have toward the children who will inherit the world, but also what their inherent joy and optimism can teach us about life. By keeping the story focused on the now, on two tender, secure moments—however fleeting—I wanted the reader to dwell on the hopefulness—the sense of this is how it should be that these moments suggest. Also, math might bring to mind the cold calculations motivating the coming events implied in the story, calculations that are brutally indifferent to the tenderness sheltering both babies. This is what I’m calling the beforemath, before everything changes.

2)  The contrast between the two children in these two places is so stark, so devastating. The story ends with a question — well, with two questions. Do you think there is an answer for it? Do you think it is something that can be borne?
I suppose people cope with the horrors of war, school shootings, racial violence, etc., in different ways. Some shut down, turn away, even justify circumstances that feel too big or too far away to grasp. Others turn to activism, fundraising, lobbying. At this point in my life what keeps me sane is seeking to build connections and communities, especially artistic communities. Writing, making any kind of art, provides a context to reflect on what it means to be human, to celebrate beauty, expose hatred and injustice, offer relief from endless bad news. I believe there’s always hope—in love, in nature, in art, in human connection—even in the darkest times. This is what makes the unbearable a little more bearable.

Beforemath ~ by Kathryn Silver-Hajo

My grandson rests his gosling-down head on my chest, gurgles milk from a bottle in the soft gloom of the room. We’ve said our goodnight moons and goodnight rooms, started the white-noise machine so he’ll drift off in sweet, sanguine sleep while halfway across the world a distant cousin nestled in his mother’s lap startles from slumber as the buzz of drones enters the room, smoke shrouds the setting moon, steel rain falls all around. How can we bear that the building, the room, the arms that cradle him are shaking, trembling, threatening to fall? Can you tell me how?

***

Kathryn Silver-Hajo writes, worries about the world, wonders how it will all work out, and writes some more.

Two Questions for Elena Zhang

We recently published Elena Zhang’s illuminating “Grandmother.”

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) I love how there are three characters in this story, though we only really see the two. The grandmother is the ghost that haunts this entire piece as the narrator breaks apart (and puts together) things that belonged to her — in memory of a promise, in service of a daughter. What kind of weight do these things hold for the narrator?
I think the grandmother’s belongings definitely haunt the narrator, providing a sense of comfort and memory. But they are also a kind of burden, something the narrator hoards and holds onto too tightly, preventing her from really building something new.

2) Is it really a Tyrannosaurus Rex that the daughter wants? Or, more specifically, is it really a Tyrannosaurus Rex that our narrator is putting together?
The daughter has that kind of childlike desire and insistence for a wish to come true, no matter how possible or impossible it may be. Out of love, the narrator wants to fulfill that wish, feeding into their shared fantasy that dead things can come back to life and look just like how we want them to.

Grandmother ~ by Elena Zhang

My daughter wants a pet Tyrannosaurus rex. Nothing else will do. So I go to the kitchen and take
out the cleaver, the good one, the one that you would always use to chop through pork ribs and
chicken bones when I was sick and wanted soup. I hack your antique coffee table to pieces.
These will be good bones, I think. Scratched and worn from years of use. Soon, they are
assembled into a skeleton, the splinters into teeth. Next, the skin. I take out your sweaters from
the back of the closet and shake off the dust before sewing them together. They still smell like
you, jasmine perfume and coconut lotion. I drape the blue and white quilt over the bones, closing
my eyes while I caress the seams. My daughter is still not satisfied. “What about the feathers?”
she asks. For that, I rummage through my bedside table drawer until I find the plastic bag filled
with your hair. I glue the gray bristles on, one by one. My daughter draws near, hugging the
dinosaur, but it doesn’t hug her back. She starts to cry, and I know it’s because there is something
missing. Something lost in the extinction. Remembering my promise to you, I tear the whole
thing down. Start again.

***

Elena Zhang is a Chinese American writer and mother living in Chicago. Her work can be found in HAD, The Citron Review, Ghost Parachute, Your Impossible Voice, and Lost Balloon, among other publications. She is a Pushcart Prize and Best of the Net nominee and was selected for Best Microfiction 2024.

Two Questions for Melanie Maggard

We recently published Melanie Maggard’s glorious “Moonshine.”

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) I love the personification of the moon here — there’s something so lunar about how you describe her! What made you choose the moon for this piece (or what made the moon choose you)?
Since I started writing a few years ago, I’ve become infatuated with the moon and find that she comes out in much of my writing. And I can’t help but think of the moon as a “she/her.” I’m not sure if this is because I personally identify with her or because of the tradition of relating the female cycle to the moon’s phases. There’s something very deep and sensual about this connection to the main reason we look to the sky at night. I’m guilty of deep diving into research on the moon, sometimes for hours (the best type of procrastination), and incorporating those little nuggets of wisdom into my pieces. With this piece in particular, I loved the idea of the moon being avoided or overlooked, much like how we feel when we don’t receive attention or love from others. The story idea came from a prompt where we were to imagine an everyday action being performed by something or someone extraordinary. 

2) The ending is so stunning and powerful! The idea of a darkness eclipsing the moon rather than the moon causing the darkness is such an intriguing (and beautiful!) idea! Do you think the man who has taken the moon into his house will ever let her know where he keeps his sugar?
I’d like to think that she takes the sugar and leaves, before it is too late and she burns out. I relate this ending to feelings of longing, discontent, and being unfulfilled. For me, it represents what we are willing to do in order to feel love, even if that means we may dim our light in order to get it. Maybe she’ll finally put her own needs above those of everyone else. Or maybe this man will just give her what she needs but there is more that she really wants. All of this gives me an idea of another story.