Two Questions for Mileva Anastasiadou

We recently published Mileva Anastasiadou’s splending “Evan Dando is Haunting Me, But This is More Than a Ghost Story.

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) I love the choice of Evan Dando as the haunt in this story — in a remarkable coincidence, the day after you submitted this story, I saw he was scheduled to perform in my town! I don’t know that he’s ever performed here before. So — what made you pick Evan Dando as the ghost haunting the narrator?

Before wtiting the story, I came upon an article on Evan Dando, which mentioned some rumors that had him dead several times although he was alive and well, and this piece reminded me of him, and I played the song “Into my arms” on repeat for several days, and that’s what happens with music, a song can serve as a time machine, it can take you back in time, especially if you haven’t heard it for long, it takes you back to the past and to emotions you had back then, and this was an unironically happy song in an ironically happy season, in the sense that I have romanticized the past, I think most of us have the tendency to do so, and it brought back all those feelings, the angst, the loneliness, the longing for a place where I’d belong, a safe place, which, I think, is what this song is about, 

2) Of course, this isn’t a ghost story at all — or at least, not in the traditional sense! It’s a story about growing up and growing old. And, maybe, holding onto that youthful part of us? What do you think?

Totally true, this isn’t a ghost story because Evan Dando is very much alive and I’m thankful for that, mainly because he’s a real person and I wish all of us could be alive and well for as long as possible, but also because he’s a huge part of my youth, and if he’s alive a part of my youth is alive too. This story is mostly about the haunting power of our youth, about how time flies, about how we grow old and we cling to the past, or we forget it and then the past – the people, the places, the music –  comes back as memories that define us and remind us who we were and who we’ve become. It’s about time, running out as we grow older, and maybe that’s why we romanticize the past, because back then, we had more time ahead of us and that made us infinite. 

Evan Dando is Haunting me But This is More Than a Ghost Story ~ by Mileva Anastasiadou

Evan Dando is haunting me, which makes this not only a ghost story, but also science fiction, for it’s a story about time travel, but only for ghosts, because he’s not dead yet, but someday he will be. Evan Dando is chasing me and he falls into my arms in a ghostly, terrifying, tender way, that’s where it’s safe, he sings, that’s where it’s warm, he sings and sings and he never gets me actually, he falls right through my arms and into the void, because that’s what ghosts do, they go through things, through matter, through flesh, they travel back and forth, in time and space. The ghost of Evan Dando is haunting me and I feel scared, but I feel flattered too, which makes this not only a ghost story, but also an eerie romance, like Wuthering Heights, a toxic love story people find romantic, about love lost and never found, about love doomed to die, only to come back stronger. He brings back my past, back when he stood by me, when I was taught how to adult, how to make the world tick, and now we’re both full-blown adults, with teeth problems and white hair, and we’re sick and tired of making the world tick, of making this world tick, tick-tock, tick-tock, closer and closer to the final boom, closer than ever to that last explosion. He brings me back to when I missed home, a safe place, or someone to whom I’d say, take me out of here, when things got rough, and they would, and they’d take over.

Evan Dando is haunting me and opens his ghostly heart to me and tells me I haunt him too, he’s haunted by many people, like I’m haunted by everything I ever loved and loved me, which makes this more than a ghost story, it’s also a philosophical story about the urge to immortalize everything that we love, the human urge to love, be loved, be seen, remembered and somehow stay here forever. His words are waves that travel forever, not fading out, they’re always loud, no friction can erase them, no law of physics can touch them, and I still hear them, they speak to me, like when I was young and the world made sense or didn’t, but someday it would eventually. He frowns sometimes, like he’s disappointed, like he wasn’t only a rock star, but also the Catcher in the Rye, and he speaks to me in a ghostly, terrifying, tender way, he says he failed, he couldn’t save us, but still that’s all he wants to do, to be an angel, protecting souls from disillusionment, like the Catcher in the Rye but for older people too, not just for kids.

The Ghost of Evan Dando is haunting me, although he’s not a ghost yet, or maybe he has always been a spirit, a soul above all else, and I haunt him too, at least a part of me that died long ago, only to come back stronger, a part of me that has already turned into a ghost, or has always been a ghost, the spirit of youth, of a world that once made sense, or didn’t but someday it would eventually. They say you’ll meet the same person in different bodies for eternity, until you learn enough to break the pattern and I did, I found someone who would jump into my arms to get home, which makes this more than a ghost story, it’s also a love letter, but he’s a ghost and he falls right through my arms, into the void, for that’s what ghosts do, they go through things, through matter, through flesh, like bullets but slower, like bullets that don’t kill, like bullets we carry inside and keep us together.

***

Mileva Anastasiadou is a neurologist, from Athens, Greece and the author of “We Fade With Time” by Alien Buddha Press. A Pushcart, Best of the Net, Best Microfiction and Best Small Fictions nominated writer, her work can be found in many journals, such as Chestnut Review, New World Writing, trampset, Lost Balloon and others.

Two Questions for Nora Nadjarian

We recently published Nora Nadjarian’s brilliant “The Kuleshov Effect.”

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) I love the way you take this film technique and use it to such brilliant effect in prose! Where did you first hear of the Kuleshov effect?

I’ve always been interested in film as an art form, fascinated in particular by Hitchcock and the techniques he uses for visual storytelling. Hitchcock uses ‘montage’ or ‘editing’ to superb effect in order to give his films their meaning. This story was written one night when, while clearing out my desk, I came across some long-forgotten notes on film editing techniques. Reading through them, it seemed to me that the Kuleshov Effect could be a great way to explore the writing of a piece of prose. I thought “show, don’t tell’ had a lot in common with juxtaposing images in film without further explanation. I started writing a story with folk tale elements, chose a few human and a few animal characters, and experimented with the form to see how far I could go. I was both surprised and delighted with the result, as it is a story quite unlike anything I’ve written before.

2) At times, this feels like it could be a retelling of Red Riding Hood. Is that your intent or just a lovely coincidence?

You’re right, there is certainly a fairy-tale element to the story but the resemblance to Red Riding Hood was unintentional. Through episodes of this girl’s life I wanted to portray a landscape of potential violence, to hint at the disturbing truths of sexism, harassment, assault, abuse. I’ve deliberately left the last sentence open-ended, rather like ending a film on an image which is both a question and an answer.

The Kuleshov Effect* ~ by Nora Nadjarian

i) How quickly time flies on a council estate and I tell you it’s a kind of freedom because you can have a fight and a baby sleeping in a crib in the same scene, or a polar bear and a sinking ship. It can all be both ethereal and real. The heroine grows up pretty. I wish the director would hurry and juxtapose her, in this chilly, crisp, almost scene, with a boa or a fox. Woman, fox, woman, fox. The audience thinks: Aha, woman! Therefore foxy.

ii) The waitress in the diner, burger and fries. Someone has lived this moment before, a million times in this scene and the ketchup has dried at the edge of the table. Can I take your order? Your order is here. She hates being told, a sudden quagmire, she’s nervous in her mini skirt. Close-up of a wolf whistle. Wolf whistle, spot of ketchup, wolf whistle, spot of ketchup. The implication is: He kills her. The blood, the blood of it, the bloodiness of it.

iii) A fairy-tale forest. Mushrooms, leaves, a quizzical silence. A bushy tail the colour of henna, dream, dream, a sort of dream. A bushy tail, a leaf, a bushy tail. There is a house, a grandmother, police. But when she left the house she was a girl, says the grandmother. The mouth of the wood where she lives is pursed and stubborn and silent. Were there any witnesses? ask the police. Question, silence, question, silence.

iv) Over and over in the story the girl was a fox, was a creature, was a colour, was wild, was devious. When the man stroked her she bit his hand, when he tried again, she bit it again. The blood was courageous and the girl was relieved when he walked out pressing his hand to stop the gash of it. The owner of the diner sacks her: Too fierce for my liking.

v) The girl gets home and the grandmother says: The police said you’d gone missing.  The grandmother cries and hugs her with relief, her chest rising and falling. With her high cheeks and pointed chin, the white patch under it on her glossy thick fur, the girls looks almost different, the girl looks almost the same.  

*The Kuleshov Effect is a film editing effect invented by Soviet filmmaker, Lev Kuleshov. It is a mental phenomenon where the audience derives more meaning from the interaction of two back-to-back shots than from one shot in isolation.

***

Nora Nadjarian is a poet and writer from Cyprus. She has been commended or placed in numerous competitions, most recently in the Mslexia Poetry Competition 2021 and Live Canon International Poetry Competition 2022. She was chosen to represent Cyprus in the Hay Festival’s Europa28: Visions for the Future in 2020. Her short fiction has appeared, among others, in the National Flash Fiction Day anthology 2020, Reflex Fiction, FRiGG, MoonPark Review, Ellipsis Zine and was selected by Kathy Fish for Wigleaf‘s Top 50 Very Short Fictions of 2022.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

Two Questions for Bill Merklee

We recently published Bill Merklee’s stunning “Grand Canyon, 1967.”

Here, we ask him two questions about his story:

1) The voice here is almost instructional, something more commonly seen in second person PoV — yet this story is in first person! What made you choose this particular style for this piece?

This story is part of a novella-in-flash I’m working on. In the novella, the MC has asked an old friend to write his life story for him, and the flashes come out of their conversations. I was struggling with this one. So I started listing the points the MC wanted to make, as if he were giving notes to his friend. When I read them back, they reminded me of those second-person stories, and I ran with it.


2) This is such a powerful, heartbreaking piece. It’s so timely now, yet there is also something timeless about it. What I love (well, one of the things I love!) is the relationship between the mother and child, the way the son-as-narrator looks back in understanding of his mother’s emotions, the son-as-character merely thinking of their journey as a road trip without dad. At what point do you think the narrator’s understanding of the situation changed?

It’s a fundamentalist household in the 1960s — there’s a lot that doesn’t get discussed, especially with a child. Even if he senses something is off, he would never dare ask about it. I think the narrator doesn’t learn the full story until he’s an adult, when he’s able to talk with his mother as more of a peer. I can see him recalling the trip while visiting her, then reading her face and asking, “What?”

Grand Canyon, 1967 ~ by Bill Merklee

Write a story about my beautiful mother: A petite, light-skinned Puerto Rican with dark hair and shocking green eyes. Write about her nervous breakdown.

Write about the doctor recommending she terminate her latest pregnancy. That he knew somebody who could do it discreetly and safely. For more money than she had saved. More than Dad made in a month, and how he would never permit it anyway.

Talk about Rh incompatibility. But try not to sound clinical about it.

Talk about a wife’s duty to her husband.

Talk about the abomination of contraception.

Have a scene where she makes the mistake of confiding in the wives of the church elders. Where she’s told only God holds the reins of life and death, and she’s made to feel like a sniveling idiot.

Write about the impromptu trip to visit friends in Arizona, just an hour north of the Mexican border. How her friends figure out her plans, and drag her back to Jesus.

Tell us about her fourth fruitless labor, and how she added this stillborn’s name to the others in the family Bible, as if they would grow up, move away, and simply forget to call.

Show us how her green eyes dulled, how her mind went places we could not go.

Yes, write a story about my beautiful mother. Then tell it from her young son’s point of view. Highlight the epic road trip without Dad. Include the greasy roadside stands, the singalongs with the radio, the bugs swarming motel lights, the friendly strangers who talked funny. How flat and tedious America was. The promise of the desert after rain.

Write of the son’s disappointment at cutting the trip short, about the drive north before heading home, how he stood at the south rim of the Grand Canyon and watched his beautiful mother weep at God’s perfect creation.

***

Bill Merklee’s work was included in Best Microfiction 2021 and nominated for Best Small Fictions 2022. He lives in New Jersey. Occasional outbursts on Twitter @bmerklee.

Two Questions for Kathy Fish

We recently published Kathy Fish’s sharp “A Solid Contribution.”

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) I love the use of the plural narrator here, the way it carries the reader from the routine to that killer ending! It’s so matter-of-fact that you almost don’t notice how devastating it is. How did you select this particular voice for this particular story?

Thanks, Cathy! I love using the first person plural point of view when I’m trying to capture a somewhat odd, collective voice. I talked about this point of view at length in my October newsletter. I’ve been reading old texts from the Project Gutenberg site. Very old instruction manuals and guide books and so forth. I think the odd voice and diction of those 19th century texts embedded themselves into my subconscious. Somewhere I came upon the “clubs, associations, societies” stuff and my brain latched on to that. It led me to this idea of in-groups and conforming that led me to this faceless, somewhat tortured, collective. 

2) The moment that really showed me where this piece was planning to take me was that line: “We need to learn the skills of judging distances.” That small turn is so powerful! Do you think there will ever be a time when skills like that aren’t necessary? Or, at least, not as necessary as they are now? 

You know, I didn’t begin the draft with that turn in mind at all. That’s how I draft all of my stories. For me, writing is an act of discovery and the things that surprise me are often the most interesting and compelling. My subconscious is by far smarter and more creative than I am. I’ve learned to trust it. As to survival skills, the kind needed to avoid being shot to death in a school, place of worship, nightclub, concert, etc., I just don’t know, Cathy. My hope is that eventually sanity will prevail in our country, but you know, these are not the most sane times. 

A Solid Contribution ~ by Kathy Fish

We have failed at Lincoln/Douglas debate. We have failed at Speech. We have failed at Hygiene. We have failed at Square Dancing. We have not been invited back to Improv. We have not been invited back to Taxidermy. We have not been invited back to Surgical Procedures 101. We have been whooped upside the head. We have been whipped into a frenzy. We have been told we lack initiative. We have been told we must learn to finish what we start. We might at one time have said, let’s start a formal club, association, society, or religion. But of course, as we’ve been told, we lack follow-through. We have been told we take up too much space. We have been told that, at times, we appear to be in our own world. We have been told we need to stack the blocks in the corner neatly before we take our turn at the easel. We need to learn the skills of being invited back to formal clubs, associations, societies or religions. We need to learn the skills of judging distances. For example, distance can be judged by sound. If we see a gun fired in the distance, we can count the number of seconds between the flash and the sound of the explosion reaching us. In this way we can tell how far we are from danger. If we see a gun fired close up, judging the distance will not be necessary and won’t help us anyway. We have been told these are good skills to learn if we wish to make a solid contribution. We will learn the skills of basic survival. We will learn to tuck and roll. We will learn to make ourselves invisible.

***

Kathy Fish’s stories have most recently appeared in Ploughshares, Wigleaf, and Washington Square Review. Her work has been widely anthologized, notably in the Norton Reader, Best Small Fictions, and Best American Nonrequired Reading. She is a recipient of the Copper Nickel Editors’ Prize and a Ragdale Foundation Fellowship. 

Two Questions for Paul Thompson

We recently published Paul Thompson’s delightful “How to Find a Prehistoric Ghost.”

Here, we ask him two questions about his story:

1) We see the world through a layer of dinosaur ghosts. We see the world through a layer of dinosaur ghosts! Omigosh, we see the world through a layer of dinosaur ghosts!! As you can tell, I’m a little bit obsessed with the concept of this story! How did you come up with this idea, this world?

I was wanting to enter a ghost story competition, and so was trying to come up with unique ideas. After eliminating everything else I was left with dinosaurs, which got me thinking about their ghosts, and why no-one ever claims to have seen one. I have no idea if the science stacks up, but I liked the idea enough to expand on it.

2) The relationship between the narrator and her ghostly brother is so lovely. Do you think he has been watching over her for a long time, or is this just a chance visit?

I think these are regular conversations. An early draft explicitly had the fog as a metaphor for her grief, and by talking to her brother he was helping her through it by finding the gaps back to the real world. I took it out and left it a bit more ambiguous – that way people can decide if it’s happy or sad or a bit of both.

How to Find a Prehistoric Ghost ~ by Paul Thompson

A hilltop conversation with the ghost of my brother. His image threadbare, glowing like some deep ocean creature.

“How many people do you think have ever lived?” he asks.

Always a numbers guy. Some strange statistic or guessing game. I snuggle into him, aligning as best I can, propping myself up to maintain the illusion.

“It’s billions,” he says. “Hundreds of billions. We outnumber the living; you are in the minority, little sister.”

Still little sister, despite me now being ten years older.

“Down there,” he says, pointing towards a field. “A man in the wildflower, still in army uniform, one arm missing. Do you see him?”

I see nothing but shadows. He laughs and prods at me, his finger slipping into my shoulder.

“Can you see them all?” I ask. “Right now, how many do you see?”

Before his reply, he does a mock scan of the horizon.

“We are sparse, despite our numbers,” he says, “We cover only a fraction of the planet’s surface. Imagine – the current living population could fit shoulder-to-shoulder in the city of Los Angeles. Did you know that?”

He pauses now, deliberate. Something is distracting him, far beyond the rocky edge where we sit.

“I brought you here to show you the dinosaurs,” he says. “You asked me why no one ever sees their ghosts.”

I sit up, confused. Did I ever ask him that? Maybe a joke or passing observation from our childhood, kept close all these years.

“The reason you never see them, is because you actually see them all the time,” he says. “Think about how many dinosaurs ever lived. Now think of their size – they were massive! They cover the entire planet, many times over. Everything you see is through the filter of a prehistoric ghost, sometimes more than one! They surround you like a blanket.”

He is bursting, enthusiastic, more alive now than ever before. I touch the air, trying to imagine the oldest of ghosts. Sensing my curiosity, he hovers an arm across my shoulder.

“Now, look,” he says, pointing to the valley. “I can show you proof, by showing you where they are not.”

And then I see it, without his help – a tiny square of light, pulsing and bending above the crop. It vanishes before expanding outwards, a rip in the atmosphere, hints of green and yellow.

“It’s a gap,” he says, “Between the ghosts. Sometimes, very rarely, you can make one out. That’s how you find them – you find the gap, the bit that is missing.”

He opens his arms out wide.

“Ta-da!” he says. “That’s the actual world you are seeing, without the filter, without the obstruction of ghosts. Beautiful, isn’t it? Now hurry.”

He runs ahead, beckoning me to follow.

 “I thought you were stuck on the hilltop!” I shout, trying to keep pace.

 He ignores my question as we approach. Up close, the gap is fragile in definition. A glare of rainbow; no heat, or sound, or shadow – a space between ghosts, an inverse of everything. It skips in the air, the illusion of being alive.

“It’s not the gap moving,” he says, “it’s the things around it. An Apatosaurus, late Jurassic, a whole herd of them.”

Before I can respond, the gap lunges forward, consuming our position. Our hands go in first, an incredible warmth, the true heat of the sun, unfiltered on our skin. We become illustrations, figures in a stain-glass window. Raw colour fills my brother, an oily volume, swirling within his form.

Looking outward from within the space, the ghosts are everywhere, now visible without obstruction. Crunching and writhing around us, a mist both alive and dead. Species from every period, compressed many times over, smudging the atmosphere.

“Amazing,” he says. “I’m so glad you got to see this.”

And with that he leaves me once more, the almost tangible feel of his fingers brushing my hand. I turn back to the hilltop, to the spot where he fell, looking for his image – a faint pencil sketch, a dream within a dream.

Around me the spectral herd begins to shift; the colours fading in its wake. Invisible giants fill the space, smoothing into a fog and smudging my vision. The gap implodes around me – reforming up ahead, flickering and thin, barely able to maintain its presence. I run toward it, toward the colour, keeping pace with the dead, and the gaps they create.

***

Paul is from Sheffield, UK. His stories have appeared in Milk Candy Review, Okay Donkey, Ellipsis Zine and Janus Literary.