We recently published Lucy McBee’s delightful “Some Kiss We Want.”
Here, we ask her two questions about her story:
1) The Junebug kiss is so powerful — you combine elements of childhood intimidation (we see how the narrator is both excited and terrified by the prospect of kissing girls and, by correlation, adulthood) and tragedy (poor Junebug!). There’s so much happening with this particular kiss! Do you think the narrator will remember Junebug fondly? Or will there always be this mixed-up feeling of terror and thrill when he thinks of her?
I do think the boy (and later, the man) will always have conflicting feelings when he thinks of Junebug. The early excitement evoked by her promise of future romantic instruction will likely be forever juxtaposed with the shock of her murder. I’ve heard we can reroute negative neural loops by consciously rewriting old narratives, but it’s incredibly hard to do, especially when the traumatic event occurred early in life. (And of course the first challenge—and a formidable one at that—is becoming aware of what’s hidden in the unconscious.) So I think the boy will find it difficult-to-impossible to recall Junebug with only fondness; sadly, her murder will probably always eclipse the softer, hopeful, life-affirming memories.
2) But of course the most powerful kiss is the one the narrator doesn’t receive. The one they won’t admit they want. Do you think the child will ever be able to admit to the father that they want things like that? Or will there always be a distance between them?
Although typically I am more optimistic than not, here I am, answering another question with a negative prediction. I think the father is so defended, so walled off, and probably so wounded and rageful over his wife’s abandonment of the family, that he won’t ever be able to become vulnerable enough to admit that he has emotional needs, and most importantly, to become curious about and open to his son’s emotional needs. It feels safer to the father to exist in a world where longing (seen as “weakness”) is cut out of you as matter-of-factly as gutting a fish. Perhaps he believes he’s benefitting his boy through this lesson, but regardless of his intent, I think the child will never be able to express his need for his father’s love and approval. And the boy will be shaped around that: at the very least, maintaining the gulf between the two of them; at worst, carrying that emotional remove (and the belief that having needs is a problem) into his adult relationships.





