We recently published Francine Witte’s gorgeous “Large Bird.”
Here, we ask her two questions about her story.
1) I love “the lostest of causes. “So far gone that even the birds look at you and think ‘nope.'” How lost of a cause is this narrator?
This narrator has had her poor heart swallowed. Again. She has gone to this beautiful place to get a different kind of lost, lost in the beauty of nature in the form of sand and sea. But instead of giving in to all that potential healing, she sees yet another chance at what she thinks and hopes will be love. The bird, of course, sees the situation for what it is, another chance at heartbreak, tries to warn the narrator, but is ignored and gives up. The narrator heads heart first into yet another mess and that’s how lost she is.
2) The environment plays such a powerful role in this story — the birds, the ocean, the beach, the “saltless rim of a margarita”: all of it bleeds into the narrator’s memories, her regrets and heartache. Do you think the effect would be the same if she had chosen to go elsewhere for vacation, say, a cabin in the woods?
I love using the environment in my stories because of the sensory richness of it. The beach has so much to see, to feel, but so do other environments. If this story were set in a cabin in the woods, another set of sensory details would be available, the scratch of bark, the splinter of floorboard, etc. And yes, it would work, but not be the same. Part of that has to do with my own connection to the ocean. I feel such a primal connection to it, and it mesmerizes me and makes me feel tiny and huge all at the same time. So the difference would be mostly an emotional one. Technically, I could add enough sensory details to make it work, but I think part of the heart of the story would be missing.





