A Sentence as Clean as a Bone ~ by Jane O’Sullivan

You were out in the yard when you found it. The back corner, where you used to play as a child, a place you thought you’d never return to. Never wanted to. You were pulling dead vines out of the lilly-pilly, yanking the ropes, and when a knot finally came loose there it was, a twig speared through one wing. It still had feathers but the eyes were gone and the little chest was empty. The ribs were clean. The butcherbirds, see. They’re territorial. They harry and chase, take trophies, leave heads on stakes. Sing.

And sing. And what else was there to do but fetch the rake? You: divorced and broke, back in the falling-down house of your ailing mother, doing yard work to earn your keep. You couldn’t leave it up there, hanging like that. And yet, that shame as you reached. Was it rotting? Would you be rained in bits? But despite all your flinching, it held.

You lifted it down, splayed on the rusted fingers of your rake. Such a light thing really. A crumpled chip packet. A rustle of grief. That wing pulled wide, that head all crooked. Still hanging, always hanging now. A gesture that can go no further, a sentence that can get no cleaner; its needle ribs like weapons, thrusting the sharpest kind of promise. Your insides ache, that old pressure pushing and pushing. You could tear yourself wide open. But the turf war is long lost, poor baby, and anyway, that’s not what bones are for.  

***

Jane O’Sullivan is an Australian writer. Her short stories and art writing have been published in Meanjin, Passages North, Going Down Swinging, Vault, Art Guide and the Spineless Wonders anthologies Pulped Fiction and Play, and her work has also won the Rachel Funari Prize and Joanne Burns Microlit Award. She lives on Bidjigal and Gadigal Land and can be found at janeosullivan.com.au and @sightlined.

Two Questions for Rachael Smart

We recently published Rachael Smart’s haunting “It May Stay at Sea for Up to Ten Years

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) I love the subtle ways you show us the differences between this pair. The way she hungers for “hot dogs and popcorn,” the way he desires “duck parfait.” The reader sees the imbalance, the mismatch between them that they might not see for themselves. What drew them together in the first place, do you think? Is it, even, perhaps, this disparity between them?
The very nature of humans is to lust for what we cannot have. Encounters without permanence, brief, rupturing intimacies. Here we find two characters who could likely never live off the same page but who admire a glimpse of what life could look like because of their differences. What ifs, once-upon-a -times. Chemistry is rarely concerned with common interests, is it?I have always been a little obsessed by the anonymity of hotels and the illicit encounters that one building can hold. All those breakfasts taken time over before people realign back into the rush of the ordinary and the mundane. The albatross can stay at sea for up to ten years. Perhaps this pairing can, too.

2) And, yes, this relationship — the line “He moves through her like a ghost in an abandoned building and she emerges less touched for all his touching” is so powerful. I love how you show that they don’t quite connect on any level, physically, emotionally. And it is such a beautiful line! She tells him this is a one-off, but do you think either of them imagine it could have been more than that?
I think they want more but she is this haunted house and him the spectre. I want to explore further the nature of abandonment, that absurd sense of an untouching. There is something so dispossessing about an affair and the impact on the human psyche: the adulterer trespassing in another body and this authentic partner elsewhere who carries so much validity, so much entitlement. There is real tragedy in that fragmented sense of an “us” where intimacy only ever exists within concealed moments. I’d like to believe she will wipe yolk from his beard again, but that relies on me writing another story.

It May Stay at Sea for Up to Ten Years ~ by Rachael Smart

The guest house is called The Wandering Albatross. 

She tells him that by the age of fifty, a single of these birds may have flown the equivalent of nearly 149 times around the globe. 
He tells her he has always wanted to fly in his sleep, but his brain is too hypervigilant.

The man on reception is coiled up with pussy-cat eyes, gifts them a cheshire grin with their keys. Paisley carpet climbs the stairs. The bed in the room is a gape of tartan. Lily soap white as stars. Two coloured glasses on the pristine sink to bring summer to their tap water. 

Far too late to eat, the tiger on reception informs when they emerge salmon-skinned from showering. They take in the dining room all the same as though domesticity is theirs for the taking. It has a fast-food feel with its red vinyl, gingham kitchen tablecloths.
She lusts for hot dogs and popcorn. He is after duck parfait. 
When she says she could murder something cheap he tells her how fast-food restaurants use car oil on pancakes instead of maple syrup: for viscous makes better billboards. Aesthetics are never what they seem, she says, even when it concerns gourmet.

He promises they might have a slow bath together in the morning. 
An oxymoron she cannot answer.

When he goes in mouth on mouth, he is grabby, he is rushing. 
He moves through her like a ghost in an abandoned building and she emerges less touched for all his touching.

She plays at host. Tips two sugars, four buttons of milk into his post-coital tea. 
Doll’s house cups, he says. They play at being grown-ups. He chinks enamel against hers. Salut, he says, and when she says nothing, he says, now there’s a good girl, say Salut.

Building a roll up with peaty tobacco, he thumbs out lumps, he rolls, he licks. 

He tells her she would be easy to hide because she leaves no marks anywhere and she reminds him this is a one off.

There is poetry in his plush mouth. His voice is a cathedral.


When the street outside picks up with night noise and the fuzzy vocals of the passersby start unspooling, he surrenders to sleep. The thermostat in the room starts climbing. A belly of a moon blues up the sheets with light, but he is adrift elsewhere. 

She cannot comprehend a man sleeping without pillows. One of his legs is in the eiderdown, the other one out, the muscle in his buttocks a conch. Yin and yang.
Sleep gazing always makes her soften.
She watches him for an age. Outside, people get lairy. The city is a snapdragon: opening. 

Grizzle on a man’s face makes her admiring. Time has been taken with the art of his razor. He reaches an arm out to viper across her ribs and she wonders if his unconscious knows that he is not holding the woman he married, and if he bathes with her until the water feels glacial, their fingers and toes corrugated, or if his wife has ever taken a blade, delicately, to the rainbows in his beard to mark out rustic fields, lines of agriculture.

Eyes widening, he tells her he dreamt about the albatross. How its under-parts were clean white, feather tips arctic black. That in order to gain height it turned to face the wind, rising on the updraught until it could rise no more, then it tipped downwards, accelerating quickly, ready for another turn. He tells her he has never heard wingbeats like it.

In the red room, their eggs are served sticky, four lemon suns. An army of soldiers for dipping. She wipes yellow off his chin bristles, tongues her finger. 

She tells him he couldn’t have heard wingbeats in his sleep, because the albatross glides hundreds of kilometres a day without a single thresh of its wings.  

***

Rachael Smart writes short prose and memoir. Recent work has been published at Ink, Sweat & Tears. She is bang into issues of desire and ever so fond of neologies. 

X Link: @SilkOctavia_@smartrachael.bsky.social

Two Questions for Kathryn Kulpa

We recently published Kathryn Kulpa’s luscious “What Is Yours First Is Yours Forever.

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) The imagery! Omigosh, the imagery! The imagery!!! (I’m really excited about the gorgeous imagery!) I know that you like working with prompts for your writing — was there a prompt here that led you to this absolutely luscious imagery?
1One of the best things about keeping a writing notebook is that I can trace the origins of a story, and therefore answer this question! This story is actually a spinoff from a 50-word story I wrote for Dribble Drabble Review. I wrote a 50-word piece about a young woman who’s adrift and living in her (older, married) boyfriend’s pool house, and this story began as a continuation of that one, but the part of it that really came to life for me was a flashback about the main character’s childhood, growing up in a family where she lost her father to these notorious murders.
I realized that was the story that interested me, and I went back and wrote it without the relationship, just focusing on the girl and her mother and her father, who isn’t mentioned until the end when we find out he was killed before she was born. I worked on this with my writing group, and for that version of the story, we had a prompt to pick a color and brainstorm some ‘yay’ and ‘nay’ associations with it. So I picked green, and for yay I had sprouting seeds and moss and for nay I had mold and Victorian green dye, which was a real thing–a color called Scheele’s Green that had arsenic in it and made people sick when they wore it or inhaled fumes from wallpaper. Then, for the final draft, we came up with random word prompts and those helped me deepen some scenes in the story: picture, coffee cup, haltingly.
The dress was based on a family friend that I vaguely remember from very early childhood. She always wore wild, bright prints, and I called her ‘the dipsy doodle lady.’ I’m not sure where the piano guy or the creepy canyon came from. They just showed up, the way things do when you start writing.

2) I love the idea of “a room of lost things.” We know what’s in the narrator’s room. What is something we might find in yours?
Mine would definitely have an old record in it! When my mom and my aunt were young, they sang with a band and recorded only one song, “That’s My Desire” (Tori Amos does a great cover of it!) on some small local label. I used to have a copy of it, but somewhere along the way, during one move or another, it was lost. That’s the first thing I’ll look for if I ever find that room.

What is Yours First is Yours Forever ~ by Kathryn Kulpa

When people ask what magic power you’d choose, you never want to fly, or be invisible. You want what you’ve always wanted, the power to make all lost things come back to you. You’d walk into the room of lost things, open your eyes, and there they’d be: the pet turtle you let loose in green grass all those years ago, the story your best friend tore up when she was mad at you, your mother’s Pucci dress, the one you loved as a child, its wild pattern like a monstera plant, moss-green leaves, pale celery background. Mommy, wear your dipsy-doodle dress! You were sure that dress had hung untouched in her closet for 35 years, zipped in its garment bag, but when you asked your stepfather, not two days after the funeral, he shrugged and said he’d sent all that stuff to Goodwill.

 You picture your mother’s eyebrow lifting. Just the one. The vintage designer dresses she collected, on wire hangers at some thrift store. But toward the end of her life she only ever wore sweatsuits, all her bright plumage faded. Maybe that dress meant nothing to her but a time she didn’t want to remember, a shadowy time almost lost to you except in gulps of vivid color, your mother chopping limes by the swimming pool; a bright yellow Big Bird toy you dragged with you everywhere that left bits of yarny fuzz in your hair; the man in a blue velvet shirt who came over and played the piano but never talked to anyone. There were stairs down to the living room, a red carpet. Look, I’m on the red carpet, your mother would say. There was a balcony on the second floor, and if you looked down all you saw was trees for miles, a dizzy-making canyon a person could disappear into, and people did. That was what you remembered most about that time: the sense of danger, of adult conversations that stopped when you walked into the room. The murders, people whispered. The trial. A nameless threat that might still be out there, in the hills. Faces would turn to you, guilty smiles, a sudden interest in coffee cups. You breathed it all in, the way Victorian children were said to breathe in arsenic from poison-green wallpaper. And then it wasn’t there: the house wasn’t there, the piano, the man in the blue velvet shirt. Your mother’s green dress, zipped away in a black bag, gone forever. In that room of lost things you’ll find it. Your mother will be there, wearing the dress, head thrown back in a model pose, long legs in knee-high boots. And sitting in the corner, by the piano, maybe a little shy, will be a man who looks just like his picture, the one picture of him your mother kept. A little slowly, a little haltingly, your mother will lead you to him. And then, for the first time, your father will take your hand.

***

Kathryn Kulpa is a New England-based writer with stories in Best Microfiction, Fictive Dream, Flash Frontier, Ghost Parachute, and other journals. Her books include Cooking Tips for the Demon-Haunted (New Rivers Press), For Every Tower, a Princess (a micro-chapbook, forthcoming from Porkbelly Press), and the flash collection A Map of Lost Places (forthcoming from Gold Line Press).

Two Questions for Gary Moshimer

We recently published Gary Moshimer’s stunning “Sleep.”

Here, we ask him two questions about his story:

1) I love how Bobby sees his mother so vividly, the way he remembers her differently, not just from the body in the casket, but from the photograph on display. But — how accurate do you think the way Bobby sees/saw his mother is to her true self?
I think Bobby definitely remembers all the little details of his mother’s face, because of how he concentrates on things, nothing can change what he saves in his brain, which is why he is upset that they made her look different.

2) The ending just slays me — “… so he felt safe to sleep, free from the life which demanded he account for every little thing.” I love that Bobby gets this momentary respite, this momentary peace. How long do you think it will last?
I don’t think he’ll be relaxed for long. He’ll always have the need to count, to feel responsible for everything.

Sleep ~ by Gary Moshimer

In the cemetery Bobby counts dandelions drifting away from his mother’s site. He’s autistic and thirty and the count is up to hundreds. He never loses track, never counts the same one twice. He picks just one, which is special to throw in on top of her casket. His eyes shine the same yellow because everything he concentrates on becomes a part of him.

Rocking on his heels he counts the words of the pastor, too many to fit in the section of his brain where they could make sense, all forty-seven of them. Tumbled over each other.

Scobbity bobbity.

Bobby takes a shovel and tosses some dirt in. One is too little. Two is too even. Three is too odd. He hates four. Five is soothing, is getting somewhere. He’d fill in the whole grave if not stopped, and then pack it down four hundred times with his shiny shoes. But his father gently takes his arm. Bobby smiles in a sly way, tosses the shovel back to the dirt pile.

At the open casket he had rearranged her face in his mind. They didn’t get the nose right. You could tell it was smashed under the putty. And her cheeks were puffed out with stuffing. Her chin like a ledge, where it had been soft and tucked with humility. Her lips had been small and straight and pale, but here they had pumped them up like a clown. Bobby started to spin there at the wake, so hard he made a wind that moved his mother’s hair across her forehead and over her purple eyelids where it always used to be.

In his mind he held a photograph of the her he wanted. Even the large photo of her on the easel was not right. Her smile was even when really it always contained a frown on one side, and a biting of the lip. No, it was not right. He had slumped in the corner, rocking with his eyes closed, seeing her get into her new fast car and wave to him. He saw the tree come up, the wet leaves, the defective air bag. She was just going to get away from him and his father for a few days.Even if she did come back it was the leaving that carried as punishment to Bobby. As he rocked tears rolled down his cheeks.

In the church basement he ate two of everything, lining them up on an opened napkin. Between each bite, chewing thirty-two times, he took five swallows of root beer. Continued the cycle, unsmiling at the aunts and uncles who tried to talk to him. Cousin Charley, a fifteen year old, led Bobby outside behind some bushes and lit him a joint. Bobby drew exaggerated breaths and almost turned blue holding them. Charley had to hold him up.

Bobby felt himself float, over to his mother’s grave, where they were done. He laughed. He removed his shoes and socks and tamped the dirt with his bare feet. He knew she would feel and appreciate that. Forty-four times, a thumping above her still but alive soul. He then scattered the hundred dandelions over her.

The sky was huge and it welcomed him to fly up. He laughed some more. He walked and counted stones until some dark line in his head stopped him from adding more. The line was heavy and pressed him down to the grass. He couldn’t breathe. He saw his mother smashed into the dash and the wheel, some final pictures of him in her head. He saw her at twenty holding him in her thin arms. Even then he had counted her heartbeats. It began then. Her breath was slow and even and he was in awe of this rhythm.

On the hill he dropped and began to roll. That open sky was gray and flicked over him as he picked up speed. The universe was expanding and he waited for the end where there would be nothing left to count, what a time to rest.

At the bottom he was stopped by the small black stones.  He traced numbers with a finger. 10 months, 2 days. 2 years, 4 months. 1900, 1910. Little Albert. June Marie. He lay on his back and watched as that sky dropped and from the gray shape his mother came and folded him in her arms so he felt safe to sleep, free from the life which demanded he account for every little thing.

***

Gary Moshimer has stories in Frigg, Smokelong Quarterly, Flash Frog, Eclectica, Necessary Fiction, and many other places.

Two Questions for Katie Coleman

We recently published Katie Coleman’s heartbreaking “Jennifer.”

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) I love the structure of this story, from the casual opening question to the killer ending question. What made you choose this question-style format for Jennifer’s story rather than a statement-style format?
I like stories that start with questions and I wanted to explore what would happen if I layered question upon question. I’d seen this interrogative style work effectively in 100-word stories and I wanted to see if it could work in a slightly longer piece. Jennifer’s story was originally written statement-style, but as I added questions I found it shaped the story and amped up the pace and intrigue, almost to the point where it pulls the reader through to the final line. I think the questions fit naturally because they replicate that mental process of going over and over something that can’t be explained through reason. I also feel that the ending leaves space for the reader to fill in with emotional resonance that hopefully, expands beyond the frame of the story.

2) And the callback to the milk at the end! The absolute devastation when the reader comes to understand what has made Jennifer what she is now. Do you think that was why there was never any milk? 
I associate milk with innocence, childhood, and nurturing. It’s the first food a baby consumes, and the act of withholding it seems sinister. Could it have been that Jennifer’s mother was struggling profoundly when Jennifer was young, perhaps she was unable emotionally and financially to meet her child’s physiological needs. It’s the Nature Vs. Nurture debate. Does this explain Jennifer’s actions when she was a child? I’m not sure but while numerous essential items could have been missing from the home, milk holds the most significance because it has to be refrigerated. Any reference to refrigerators will certainly trigger challenging emotions in these two characters. 

Jennifer ~ by Katie Coleman

Do you remember Jennifer who used to drink lattes at the Socialist Worker Coffee Shop, to compensate for the calcium deficiency caused by the formula her mother fed her throughout primary school? Did her mother wince when Jennifer accidentally poured milk in her tea? ‘We’ll have no milk in this house,’ her mother always said.

Did Jennifer lack personality as well as calcium, which wasn’t as easy to replace? Did her ex, Simon, a psychiatric nurse, believe he could fix her, even with the open compass on her nightstand, its wide legs stabbing outwards like a dancer’s? Did the compass protect her from groaning wraiths that poured through the walls at night? Did she quit wearing jogging bottoms and muddy trainers, and instead spend hours twisting her hair into ribbons?

Did her sister make noises when she was inside the fridge? Who had found the abandoned fridge first? Had it been Jennifer’s or her sister’s idea to hide? Had she dragged the armchair by herself and managed to heap it on top? Had she gone away to swim and not heard the kicking and soft moans? Had she opened the door afterwards by herself? 

Had Simon and all the therapists told her that it wasn’t her fault? That she was too young to be left alone for days on her own taking care of her sister. And was that why there was never any milk?

***

Katie Coleman is a British writer living in Thailand. Her work has appeared in Roi Faineant Press, Ghost Parachute, The Sunlight Press, SoFloPoJo, Bending Genres, The Odd Magazine, Ilanot Review and more. She has received nominations for Best of the Net and Pushcart prizes and can be found on Twitter @anjuna2000 and Instagram @kurkidee

Two Questions for Cressida Blake Roe

We recently published Cressida Blake Roe’s glorious “Second Lead Syndrome.”

Here, we ask her two questions about her story:

1) So who isn’t a sucker for a Second Lead, right? They’re so much more tragic and interesting than the lead! You just want to take them home and … comfort them! I love how you hit on this trope, but also give us a real, vibrant creation here. Is there a Second Lead out there whose plight tugs at your heartstrings?
I have to mention two famed Second Leads, Baek In-Ho of Cheese in the Trap and Gong Tae-Kwang of Who Are You: School 2015, since they were the ones who inspired this piece. A common trait between them in particular is their popularity within the fandoms and how so many viewers really regretted that they didn’t end up with the heroines. It raised this question for me of acceptable Second Lead attractiveness. If a Second Lead is too compelling, is that bad writing, according to the Laws of Tropism? Or is it good writing, because he makes our hearts waver just as he makes the heroine’s? That paradox got me intrigued and led me into this story.

2) And speaking of this trope — what do you think of its effectiveness? Could a love story be equally as rich without a second lead pining for the heroine? Or do we need him to see how truly special she is?
So much of what a Second Lead can do is almost beyond mere romanticism, even though that’s his most visible role in the plot. He’s also a very load-bearing character in what he does to the narrative, which is something a bit different: he’s naturally a foil to the First Lead and the heroine, a perfect third point to the triangle that supports the whole structure. We learn more about them, both good and bad, than we would if he weren’t there. He expands the story-world beyond their immediate interpersonal sphere to broader and more dangerous forces, since he’s often connected to the main antagonist. But although he introduces conflict of all kinds to the heroine, he also provides a great deal of comfort to her and can be the most vulnerable character we see on-screen. Through this, we become deeply invested in his struggle—all the more so, I believe, because we know he’s doomed. This connection with the audience is also a significant aspect: I find the Second Lead such a great archetype because although he’s a tragic figure, he’s also such a relatable one. He struggles and grows and loses people and endures, even without the nice tidy reward of a traditional happily ever after. In some ways, his heroism is his ordinariness. Of course, not every story demands this kind of relationship or dynamic. But what it does and what it evokes from us is unexpectedly complex, which is why the Second Lead—especially in k-dramas—can be so beloved.